From the Web Editor
Virtual Universities
How many internet mail list subscribers
does it take to change a light bulb?
Special News Items
Carlton Scott WAOE Fellowships
Congratulations to Brian Donohue-Lynch
... and Mike Holmwood
Welcome to New Members
Orientation Course
Memberâs Profile
David Wyatt
About Member's
Profile
Conference
(Re)Call
Reports:
Community Learning Networks Online Forum
Synchronous Internet Training Listserv
MIT's Media-in-Transition Conference
Coming Events:
IFETS Online Discussion: November
1-12
Distance Education Association
of New Zealand (DEANZ) Conference
About Conference (Re)Call
Your Say
WAOE dues a good investment
About Your Say
New Links
LessonPro.Net
Library of Congress Catalogue
Online
Alertbox: Ten Good Deeds in Web
Design
WEB Ideas and
Issues
Internet Industry Association
(Australia): Draft Code of Practice
Electronic Privacy Information
Centre on Filters and Freedom
Intellectual Property Rights
on the Internet
About Web Ideas and Issues
News Briefs
On the Horizon: September-October
Issue
theNode.org
WAOE Policies
and Procedures
Release of Personal Information
Waiver of Membership Fees/Dues - Policy
and Procedure
Notifying Change of Email
Address
How to unsubscribe or resign
About Waoe
Policies and Procedures
Forthcoming
Meetings
No items for this issue.
About this Section
Time Conversion Site
Feedback
No items for this issue
About WAOE
WAOE's Objectives
The Meaning and Exercise
of Membership in WAOE
WAOE's Communications and
Discussion System
WAOE Committees
and OCREWs
############
By force of circumstances rather than intention, WEB once again comes out on a sort of monthly instread of bi-monthly schedule for which we apologise. The shift is expected to be merely temporary and short-lived. November will be a key month for the Coordinating Ring to look at ways of consolidating networking among members, and the development of some major initiatives. Resumption of the normal publication arrangements for WEB will be part of this work.
Production of WEB has inevitably taken a bit of a back seat in the three weeks plus that have elapsed since the September issue and the close of the call for membership renewals on October 1, while I and other members of the Coordinating Ring have been much preoccupied with discussions about strategic directions for WAOE. These discussions have been prompted by the fact that the constraints on our operating budget and the reduction of our committed membership base are both more severe than we anticipated, following a disappointing response to the drive for dues. This issue of WEB, on the other hand, reflects positive responses that we are already making - for example, the Carlton Scott Fellowships.
David Wyatt, WAOE Membership Officer and WEB Editor
Back to Contents
#############
How many WAOE members have received unsolicited posts like the following?
UNIVERSITY DIPLOMASOn the face of it (I haven't called ... yet), this looks like a more than usually in-your-face example of what John Bear** calls the "less than wonderfuls" among institutions offering degrees via the Internet. Recent years - months, weeks, or days, even! - have seen a burgeoning of such institutions, calling themselves (with perhaps (?) unconscious irony) virtual universities. Just how "virtual" can you get!
Obtain a prosperous future, money earning power, and the admiration of all.
Diplomas from prestigious non-accredited universities based on your present knowledge and life experience.
No required tests, classes, books, or interviews.
Bachelors, masters, MBA, and doctorate (PhD) diplomas available in the field of your choice.
No one is turned down.
Confidentiality assured.
CALL NOW to receive your diploma within days!!!
Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including Sundays and holidays.
** John Bear and Mariah Bear are the authors of Bear's Guide to Earning Degrees Nontraditionally, now in its 13th edition. More information about this publication and John's work more generally is supposed to be available at http://www.degree.net, but I couldn't reach this site the few times I tried. John is a frequent contributor to the newsgroup alt.education.distance which, among other preoccupations, maintains an ongoing review of questionable practices in online and distance learning.
There is growing interest in cyberspace in defining and/or challenging the merits or otherwise of virtual universities or similar online providers of higher education. For example, the Chronicle of Higher Education Colloquy is currently running a debate and discussion centred around widely divergent opinions expressed in two articles on accreditation of online universities. One argues that virtual universities "raise the specter of a higher-education system that is nothing more than a collection of marketable commodities." The other defends accreditation of these institutions, but asserts that critics of them are not concerned primarily with the quality of education offered by on-line universities, but with the possibility of "reduced faculty control over the design, teaching, and evaluation of curricula at distance-education institutions." Another example is the warning put out recently by the Telecampus site urging prospective clients of online higher education to be careful about taking courses from a large number of listed organisations.
So, what has this got to do with WEB and WAOE? Well, a recently joined member, Adelaide-based George Brown, has approached the Coordinating Ring to seek support for the work he is doing to alert educational authorities in Australia and elsewhere to the dubiousness of the proclaimed credentials of a number of organisations offering degrees via distance learning in general and the Internet in particular. George is also a frequent contributor to the newsgroup alt.education.distance, and he maintains an information site on Virtual Universities in Australia at http://www.cobweb.com.au/~agbrown/home.htm.
The professionalisation and continuing improvement of online education is,
of course, WAOE's essential purpose. Developing and sustaining standards
of good practice in delivery of courses, and access to them, is a central commitment
of the Association, and the Educational
Standards OCREW has already been established to undertake responsible analysis
of the issues affecting recognition of online course providers. As a vital
first step in creating a policy platform from which WAOE could identify basic
standards for online and computer mediated instruction, and so mount unassailable
attacks on bogus practitioners, WAOE members are urged to join the Educational
Standards OCREW, or contribute to its work in other ways. For example,
you could:
WEB intends to play a useful part in this work. Until arrangements
for efficient networking of the ESOCREW are in place, discussion of
the group's agenda will continue to take place on WAOE-Views.
However, this listserv is still greatly undersubscribed, and WEB offers
a regular outlet for passing on major items of information and debate
to the membership at large. As well, the Conference
(Re)Call section provides a ready forum for members to report events
they have attended or heard about where important policy matters were
discussed, or good ideas were presented about online education practice.
Coming Events, within that section, promotes various conferences and
other activities - as far as possible, conducted online events and free
or low-cost - which members can attend, and we are always looking for
members to alert us to events to include which target issues and concerns
most relevant to WAOE's objectives.
Please use email to the Web Editor as the channel for passing on all items of interest. In a more focused way - depending upon such contributions, of course - the next and subsequent issues of WEB will include a Virtual University Watch column, or something like that (perhaps Caveat Emptor?), specifially aimed at passing on advice about obviously bogus operators. Once the key question of adopting a policy on standards as settled, through the work of the ESOCREW, WAOE will be in a position to set about endorsing online courses - credit and noncredit - to potential clients on the basis of their recognised quality, and recommending action by responsible agencies on organisations which are debasing standards ort exploiting the lack of them. At that hopefully not too future time, WEB will also report these activities on a regular basis.
No doubt, all of us feel that more immediate and more drastic action should be taken against operators like the author of the post at the start of this piece. WAOE is committed to doing so, but the Association must first of all establish its foundation and authority for action. We'll need your input.
Back to Contents
#############
How many internet mail list subscribers does it take to change a light bulb?
Just to lighten things up a little! With thanks to scotartt <scot@systemx.autonomous.org>, passed on by the Media Mentor list.
Q: How many internet mail list subscribers does it take to change a light bulb?
A: 1,331
1 to change the light bulb and to post to the list that the light bulb has
been changed14 to share similar experiences of changing lightbulbs and how the
light bulb could have been changed differently.
7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs.
27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs.
53 to flame the spell checkers
156 to write to the list administrator complaining about the light bulb discussion
and its inappropriateness to this mail list.
41 to correct spelling in the spelling/grammar flames.
109 to post that this list is not about light bulbs and to please take this
email exchange to alt.lite.bulb
203 to demand that cross posting to alt.grammar, alt.spelling and alt.punctuation
about changing light bulbs be stopped.
111 to defend the posting to this list saying that we are all use light bulbs
and therefore the posts **are** relevant to this mail list.
306 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy
the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this
technique, and what brands are faulty.
27 to post URLs where one can see examples of different light bulbs
14 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly, and to post corrected URLs.
3 to post about links they found from the URLs that are relevant to this list
which makes light bulbs relevant to this list.
33 to concatenate all posts to date, then quote them including all headers and
footers, and then add "Me Too."
12 to post to the list that they are unsubscribing because they cannot handle
the light bulb controversy.
19 to quote the "Me Too's" to say, "Me Three."
4 to suggest that posters request the light bulb FAQ.
1 to propose new alt.change.lite.bulb newsgroup.
47 to say this is just what alt.physic.cold_fusion was meant for, leave it here.
143 votes for alt.lite.bulb.
Back to Contents
#############
Carlton Scott WAOE Scholarships
The following notice was posted recently to WAOE-News and WAOE-Views by President Steve McCarty. Apologies to those members who have seen it already because they have subscribed to the listserves. Those who haven't know what to do! Web Editor
Announcing a new World Association for Online Education (WAOE) policy:
Carlton Scott WAOE FellowshipsBack to Contents
A multicultural policy administered by the late educator's colleague Karen O'Connor, business technology department head at Selkirk College in Canada.Rationale
A British Columbia accident felled Carlton Scott in his prime as an educator with a passion for online learning. He was a founding WAOE member and would have wished that the opportunity for WAOE participation be opened as widely as possible. Among WAOE aims stated in the Bylaws, WAOE promotes multiculturalism and access to online educational technology. This policy provides a chance to honor Carlton's memory while contributing to the broadening of the online teaching profession.Implementation
WAOE officers are privileged to offer dues-waived WAOE memberships as defined in WAOE Bylaws and policies, until June 30th of the following year, particularly to non-Westerners, non-native users of English, and those who have contributed services to WAOE or whose membership would reflect well on WAOE's professional standing. Each WAOE Coordinating Ring member would be requested to invite three to five such individuals, except that each WAOE elected Director would be requested to invite three to ten such individuals. Those invited would need only respond in the affirmative, and would be expected to fulfil the obligations and privileges of WAOE membership.Background
WAOE has 18 officers in 8 countries, including 5 elected directors. WAOE is a virtual association with a conduit to the physical world through California law as a non-profit public benefit corporation. The Bylaws <http://www.csus.edu/indiv/s/seehaferj/waoe/bylaw.htm> include 22 Objectives and Purposes of relevance to distance education since the advent of Web-based approaches. The full list is at: <http://leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu/org/occ/logs/1185.html>. Directly relevant to this new policy are the sections on multiculturalism and the widest possible access to educational technology. There is a Multilingual WAOE Project in progress, and the aim of the new policy is for WAOE to be multicultural in its very organizational practices. For while participants may already apply for dues waivers, we recognize cultural and other reasons that inhibit individuals from requesting such a favor. WAOE officers are thus empowered and honored to invite a wide range of individuals described in the above policy. Officers are also open to specific recommendations. New active members are most welcome, and we further intend to actively recognize service to the organization in lieu of dues.
Congratulations to Brian Donohue-Lynch ... and Mike Holmwood
WAOE Executive Secretary Brian Donohue-Lynch has been designated Connecticut Professor of the Year. Congratulations from us all!
Brian writes:
"I know that one part of what was evaluated was my connection with our WAOE efforts. I will be sure that in anything I am asked to talk about (in local press, in our state [college] system, etc.) WAOE will certainly be on my lips!"It is particularly appropriate to repeat here the personal congratulations to Brian from Mike Holmwood via WAOE-Views:
"Congratulations Brian ... I know how much hard work an award such as this means.... last year I was presented with the Canadian Community College Professor of the Year award. In Canada CASE jointly with the Canadian Council for the Advancement of Education gives out one award for teaching excellence for a University Professor and one for a Community College Professor [last year was the first year that this award was given in Canada].... we do not as yet have provincial awards.What an honour and privilege to have two such distinguished online educators in our Association.My work in online education was certainly a component in the decision to select me for the award [I have taught first year Biology online for three years].
My membership in WAOE has proven to be invaluable and I believe that anyone teaching online needs to be a member of WAOE as it gives one an over-arching view of the on-line world .. a view essential for anyone instructing on the internet."
The Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE) began the Professors
of the Year program in 1981 in response to a challenge by Thomas B. McCabe,
former CEO of Scott Paper and an outstanding alumni volunteer and supporter
of education, for CASE and its members to recognize teachers
like those at his alma mater Swarthmore College, who had inspired him to become
an active volunteer and donor. CASE started organizing competitions in
various states in 1985 and established an award for faculty at Canadian institutions
in 1986. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching began hosting
the final round of judging in 1981.
The primary characteristic the judges consider is an extraordinary dedication to undergraduate teaching, which should be demonstrated by excellence in the following areas:
For more information about the awards, go to http://www.case.org/awards/poystate.htm
Back to Contents
#############
On behalf of all the existing members, the Board of Directors and the members of the Coordinating Ring (WAOE's management executive) extend a very warm welcome to members who have registered to join the Association in the past few weeks. We look forward to your becoming active participants in WAOE discussions and other activities.
As with any unfamiliar organisation, there must be a lot of questions in the minds of recent joiners. The first place new members should go to for answers, of course is the WAOE Orientation Course. As well, mostly through links to the Orientation Course, this section of WEB will try to anticipate and answer one or two of the questions new members might be pondering by providing some fundamental information in each issue.
New members - and existing members - might also explore the WAOE Policies and Procedures section of WEB and the About WAOE section.
If you have any question at all about the Association, send it to the Web Editor so we can respond to it in an appropriate section of WEB.
Back to Contents
#############
Thanks to generous support from long-standing member John Spiers and his LearnOnline organisation, and to the hard conceptualising and drafting work of Treasurer, Jenna Seehafer, WAOE has now established an Orientation Course which will provide essential information on a continual basis about the organisation and how it operates. Please note that the Web pages for the Orientation Course are still under construction. Jenna and other WAOE Officers will add sections and items - including several parts of WEB as it now looks - as time permits and opportunity presents. You can go to the pages in progress either through Orientation Course, or through the View Course link on the WAOE Orientation Course enrolment page.
Back to Contents
#############
David Wyatt, WAOE Director and Membership Officer
I must say, not being an online practitioner as such, that I sometimes wonder what I'm doing in the thick of supporting an organisation dedicated to the establishment and continuing improvement of online education as a profession. Things can get a bit hairy at times (to use an Aussie colloquialism), especially when my limited technical expertise gets violently challenged by the occasional (?!) vagaries of browsers and other software. But then I reflect that significant parts of my background in Australian higher education teaching and management, and in running projects concerned with flexible delivery and staff development in the vocational education and training, have brought me into close contact with most of the issues in the field WAOE seeks to serve. Commitments to access and equity in education, to quality in teaching and learning practice and to lasting value in outcomes for students are not - or should not be - confined to specific professional areas.
Appointed as a lecturer in English to a new teachers college in 1967 - early in the burgeoning years of higher education in Australia, which ended all too soon in the mid-1970s - I soon began contributing to the administrative side of the institution, focusing in particular on academic advisement, recognition of prior learning, development and accreditation of courses and liaison with the relevant professions and the wider community. Over time, this work led to leadership roles in these areas and I went on from there to senior management. The so-called advanced education institutions (institutes of technology and teachers colleges, mainly) I worked in until the late 1980s, when mergers and other forms of rationalisation (read cost-cutting) collapsed them into what is laughably called the "unified national system" (of universities), were at the forefront of post-secondary education. They were innovative, not to say adventurous and experimental, in their approaches to program content, design and delivery, but at the same time strongly committed to the principle of accountability for the quality and value of their work and its outcomes - to students, prospective employers of the students, professional authorities, and the wider community, as well as to governments, of course.
An especially challening, and rewarding, application of my professional interests and concerns was - and still is - the management of effective access, teaching and learning delivery and support programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in such higher education fields as teacher education, nursing, management, and liberal studies.
Leaving the university sector in mid-1994 to take up consulting and educational project management as a career, I already had under my belt a project that created a professional development package for workplace education practitioners and another for adult literacy teachers. Both adopted flexible learning approaches, but it was still early days in Australia for Web-based training, and the project teams stopped short of using electronic communications. Even in the subsequent development of a national plan for the flexible delivery of adult literacy and numeracy and English as a second language programs, and another for the professional development of practitioners in those fields, the funding agencies, professional spokespersons and community representatives involved still showed some distrust of information technology in general and online education in particular, which somewhat limited the usefulness of these products. Nevertheless, I have no doubt that everything I contribute to WAOE derives very largely from this past experience in higher education and in vocational education projects.
My first practical engagement with the possibilities of online education came in 1995 -1996, when I managed a project which made real headway on using the Internet to conduct a self-paced, interactive teaching development program for academic staff across the three universities in South Australia. Unfortunately, the experience was too short-lived, as the project got funding for only six productive months - too brief a period to realise all its potential. The site set up by the "SATURN" project - the South Australian Three Universities Resources Network - still exists at http://saturn.flinders.edu.au/, if anyone wants to take a look at what we attempted, and how far we got. Follow the Postgraduate Education and the Teaching and Learning links from the home page.
Involvement with SATURN led directly to participation in several online conferences and some f2f workshops exploring new approaches to education and training at several levels and in different fields, using information technology and telecommunications. And so eventually to the Teaching in the Community Colleges online conference in 1998, which gave birth to WAOE. As an elected Director of the Association, I have particular responsibility for managing the membership recruitment processes, including the development of a database and network/communications system. Needless to say, I undertake this role with major input and assistance from other officers and members who possess far more technical knowhow than I do, for all that I'm now probably on the fastest learning curve ever in my whole professional life! Editing WEB is an important contribution, as I see it, to the ongoing communication between the management of the Association and its members.
I also try to stay in touch with longstanding interests in educational access and quality by getting involved in relevant projects and other activities of WAOE. An example is my participation - representing WAOE with responsibility for managing international links and consultations - in the team which made a recent application for a Learning Anywhere Anytime Program grant (in the USA) to develop guidelines for delivering online education to people with visual impairments. This was not successful in 1999, but reviewers' feedback strongly encourages making another attempt next year.
Currently in my project management work, I am responsible for the evaluation of a pilot program installing Internet-ready computers and providing skills training in two Indigenous communities in rural South Australia. In less than five very part-time months, this small-scale initiative has seen community members leap from almost total unfamiliarity with telecommunications, let alone the Internet, to confident surfing of links to similar communities across the world, handling official business by email, settin up electronic banking, and planning for creating Websites and for taking more specialised training in Web-based research, electronic commerce and financial management. It is now hoped that the outstanding success of the pilot will lead to a further, bigger grant in 2000, which would extend installation and training to several more Indigenous communities and support consultations and investigations aimed at creating an implementation strategy for reaching all remaining communities over the subsequent two or three years.
Back to Contents
##############
In each issue of WEB a different member introduces him- or herself and talks about experiences and interests in online education and training. Drawing on the information and URLs provided on their registration forms, the WEB Editor is targetting individual members who are doing especially innovative and exciting things in online education with requests to provide a brief profile.
But why wait to be asked? All WEB readers are urged to use the Memberâs Profile to help flesh out the person behind the impersonal email address youâre known by in WAOE. We are a member's organisation - reMEMBER!! Just a short piece will do. As well as giving us some background information, weâd like you to tell colleagues why you joined WAOE, what you hope to gain from your involvement, and what you would like to contribute.
Back to Contents
#############
Community Learning Networks Online Forum
The working definition of Community Learning Networks offered on the CLN site is ãcommunity- controlled structures and systems aimed at furthering community development and enhancing the lives of their constituencies by supporting and encouraging lifelong learning.ä Key CLN components are:
Sponsored by the Office of Learning Technologies, Human Resources Development
(Canada), CLN
Online Forum provides a moderated, bilingual (French/English), interactive,
24/7 service for people interested in the development and ongoing support of
learning which:
"Service" is a good descriptive word for the Forum. Within the several
key discussion topics are already available -
For more information contact the moderator, Doug Knight, at dknight@telusplanet.net.
Back to Contents
#############
Synchronous Internet Training Listserv
Arun Tripathi recently sent it this notice about a new discussion group focused on synchronous online learning.
The Synchronous Internet Training list ('synctrain') is a moderated discussion list created to serve trainers, educators, and other people interested in Live Online Learning. This list is sponsored by InSyncTraining Synergy, and is moderated by Jennifer Hofmann, a Virtual Classroom Designer. Discussions take place on product information, synchronous training techniques, Internet pedagogy, and supporting multimedia. Announcements regarding job openings, conferences, and classes relevant to the subject area are also posted.
In order to send mail to the list, you need to address your message to: synctrain@listbot.com.
Back to Contents
#############
MIT's Media-in-Transition Conference
Julia Keefer (jk12@is3.nyu.edu), Editor of JOE, WAOE's online journal, writes:
I want to report that MIT's Media-in-Transition conference went very well. It was a high-powered 3 day conference with eminent professors and industry professionals from MIT, Harvard, Europe, Australia, the East, California etc. Most of the focus was on the political, sociological and aesthetic aspects of media transition but I was on a TRANSFORMING TEACHING panel the last day where I presented my paper CYBERPERFORMANCE AS AN ACADEMIC RITUAL. We spent some time discussing online teaching strategies and cultural diversity, at which point I talked about JOE and the WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR ONLINE EDUCATION--how we started and what are objectives are. During the closing panel on multidisciplinary studies, I also talked about my experiences in this field.
My work was very well received and I was impressed with the diversity, range and excellence of the presentations. MIT is making a sincere effort to really understand and establish interdisciplinary studies. Some traditional professors have a hard time adapting to the new media but MIT itself is the home of the AGELESS MIND, geeks who play forever. It's inspiring the way some of these brilliant programmers like John Maebe can continually create with the imagination of a teenage genius and the methodology of the most meticulous, mature professor. It is time to join the best of traditional academe with cutting edge learning strategies that have been developing for years in cyberspace.
Eventually I hope to use JOE as a way of bringing the two worlds together.
Back to Contents
#############
IFETS Online Discussion: November 1-12
The next fromal onoine discussion of the International Forum of Educational Technology & Society (IFETS) will be conducted between November 1 and 12. Discussion will be both moderated and sumarised by Wendy Lowe, Instructional Designer with Oracle, Canada. The theme is "Transactional distance theory as a foundation for developing innovative and reactive instruction."
Wendy's re-discussion paper is available at the Forum website: http://ifets.gmd.de/.
(Please follow the link 'discussion schedule' -> 'Current/next discussion',
and click on the discussion title.) Some of the issues to be discussed
are:
To participate in the discussion fill out the registration form at http://ifets.gmd.de/ and subscribe to the discussion list as explained at: http://ifets.gmd.de/maillist.html.
The International Forum of Educational Technology and Society (IFETS) is a sub-group of IEEE Learning Technology Task Force. The forum aims to bring together the developers of educational systems, and the educators who implement and manage such systems.
Back to Contents
#############
Distance Education Association of New Zealand (DEANZ) Conference
Chris Jesshope has asked us to post the following notice:
Distance Education Association of New Zealand (DEANZ) ConferenceConference theme:
Supporting the Learner through open, flexible and distance strategies: Issues for Pacific Rim CountriesDates: 27-29 April 2000
Venue: St. Margaret's College Dunedin, New ZealandCall for abstracts: 1 December 1999
Call for papers: 1 March 2000
Format: posters, 20 or 45 minute papers, 90 minute workshopsMain Issues for presenters to address :
Infrastructure for open, distance and flexible learning:
* Establishment issues for ODF in traditional settings
* Convergence of on and off site teaching
* Quality Assurance
* Information literacy
* Support issues for learners, teachers, tutors, librarians,
technicians and providersGlobal issues for open, distance and flexible learning:
* Equity and access issues
* Teaching for diversity
* Expansion of the knowledge economy
* Internationalisation and globalisationTheories of open, distance and flexible learning
* Changing paradigms
* Re-conceptualising teaching and learning
* Changing student learning outcomes through ODFFor further information, please contact the programme coordinator:
Dr Claire McLachlan-Smith
University of Auckland
New Zealand
email: c.mclachlansmith@auckland.ac.nz
Back to Contents
################
The success of Conference (Re)Call therefore depends very heavily on input from members. WAOE officers are already out there reporting on events theyâve attended and spotting others to come. Weâd like to see all other members doing likewise. You will see from the items in this issue that reports donât need to be lengthy or detailed, let alone polished. We think the segment will work best on the simple premise that whatever any one member found worthwhile in attending an online education event, or attractive about an event in the offing is likely to benefit and interest other members. So, letâs keep those reports and notices coming in to the WEB Editor.
Back to Contents
################
"The September issue of WEB focused on WAOE's dues structure. To some
members, the word "dues" may have a negative impact. However, few (if
any) professional organizations charge only $10 per year for membership.
I feel that my $10 will be well invested."
Mary Ellen Nourse
WAOE Publicity Chair
Back to Contents
#############
The idea of this section of WEB is to offer a specific forum where members can ask questions or raise concerns or make comments about any aspect of the organisation and running of WAOE itself. So, if anything is bothering you - or even if you'd like to pay us a compliment! - send an email to the WEB Editor. If the message is printable ;-)), it will appear in the next available number. And, depending upon the responses generated, it may help to start up a thread of discussion on the WAOE WebBoard.
Back to Contents
#############
Would any member be interested in taking a closer look at this site and providing a review for the Conference (Re)Call section? Here's its promotional blurb:
LessonPro.Net is a free program provided by E-tutor Virtual Learning that allows teachers to tap into the exciting possibilities of using the Internet in education. LessonPro gives educators a way to create online lessons with a user-friendly, fill-in-the-blank template. By registering with LessonPro, teachers can store their lessons on the Internet, allowing students to access the materials with a lesson ID and password. The dynamic nature of our lesson format can integrate resources on the World Wide Web through hotlinks to educational references, interactive sites and informational resources, all embedded within each lesson.
The site provides K-12 educators with a format for creating teaching, activities and lessons for use over the Internet. The free program is entirely accessible through the Internet. There is no need to learn complicated HTML programming and coding. The easy-to-use format guides the teacher through each part of the lesson. Lessons are ready for Internet access the minute they are completed and sent to our host server. Teachers, students and parents can access lessons at any time, via their web browsers. The LessonPro format includes nine parts:
*****************************
Library of Congress Catalogue Online
The new Library of Congress Catalog went online on August 31. Quoting from the site itself, "The new Library of Congress Online Catalog is a database of approximately 12 million records representing books, serials, computer files, manuscripts, cartographic materials, music, sound recordings, and visual materials in the Library's collections. The Online Catalog also provides references, notes, circulation status, and information about materials still in the acquisitions stage." For more details, see the About page at: http://catalog.loc.gov/libinfo.htm.
******************************
Alertbox: Ten Good Deeds in Web Design
Jakob Nielsen's discusion of "ten design elements that would increase the usability of virtually all websites if only they were employed more widely, " in the latest issue of his Alertbox newsletter is well worth a visit in itself. Plus it serves to introduce surfers to this always interesting source of stimulating ideas and often challenging opinions. Go to http://www.useit.com/alertbox/991003.html for some useful practical tips on Web presentation, and branch out from there to browse the other Alertbox columns in the current series and in the archives.
Back to Contents
##############
As always, if any member feels stirred by the snippets on controversial issues offered here, please feel free to use Your Say to make a comment, or kickstart a discussion on WAOE-Views. Web Editor
Internet Industry Association (Australia): Draft Code of Practice
The following is an extract from the Online Australia bulletin for September 6. It ties in with continuing controversy over the Commonwealth Government's insistence that Internet Service Providers accept liability for the monitoring of Website to prevent pornographic material coming into the view of minors.
The Australian Internet Industry Association (IIA) has unveiled its draft code for Internet service and content hosting providers.So, how do members think the important issue of preventing or controlling the distribution of pornography over the Internet should be handled?The code addresses parts of the Broadcasting Services (Online Services) Act (BSA) - if the industry signs up to it there will be no need for the Australian Broadcasting Authority (ABA) to develop its own.
The IIA's code will require ISPs to provide Internet users with information and links to filtering software and other access control methods which they can use to censor and control online content in their own homes. Internet access accounts should not be provided to persons under the age of 18.
ISPs will not be required to meet the cost of the provision of software - which will be met by filtering software companies, who must update and distribute their software with the URLs of restricted material when alerted to it by the ABA.
In return for making content control solutions available the ABA will not require ISPs to block or monitor any material on the Internet. Serious illegal content will be reported by the ABA to the relevant police authorities in the country it is hosted.
"The approach can be reduced to four words ... 'industry facilitated user empowerment'," said Peter Coroneos, the IIA's executive director.
Other provisions address consumer reluctance to go or buy online - spam, privacy, copyright and fair trading. Some of these aspects were hashed out with the assistance of the Australian Consumers Association.
The code will be administered by an independent council and businesses who sign up will be entitled to display a compliance symbol on their Web site.
The Code will undergo changes from submissions over the next month. It is available on the IIA's Web site at http://www.iia.net.au.
******************************
Electronic Privacy Information Centre on Filters and Freedom
Here's a different approach from that of Australian officialdom to the question of monitoring the content of the Internet. I picked it up on September 9 from George(s) Lessard's MediaMentor listserv.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) in Washington, D.C. has released a new collection of critiques and studies that analyze the potential problems of Internet filtering and rating systems. "Filters and Freedom: Free Speech Perspectives on Internet Content Controls" warns that the adoption of software to limit the availability of material online may jeopardize free expression and facilitate governmental censorship.To Subscribe to MediaMentor via e-mail, send an empty message (no signature files or e-business cards) to mediamentor-subscribe@egroups.com. Be brave, stay calm, watch for the signs. List owner George(s) Lessard's URL is http://members.tripod.com/~media002. Please visit to learn more about him and his digital distance education work.The EPIC publication includes articles by leading advocates of free speech on the Internet, including the American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Frontiers Australia, Peacefire, Cyber-Rights & Cyber-Liberties (UK), the Censorware Project, Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, the Global Internet Liberty Campaign, the Internet Free Expression Alliance, and the National Coalition Against Censorship.
Copies of the report will be distributed to participants of the Internet Content Summit in Munich this week, where 300 Net industry executives, government officials, legal scholars, and consumer advocates are joining to discuss proposals for controlling content on the Internet. The most controversial policy centers upon the implementation of a world-wide system of self-rating.
EPIC General Counsel David Sobel, who is attending the conference in Munich, said it is imperative to examine the arguments presented in "Filters and Freedom" before determining an approach for Internet regulation. "These views must be considered carefully if we are to preserve freedom of expression in the online world," Mr. Sobel said.
"Filters and Freedom: Free Speech Perspectives on Internet Content Controls," David Sobel, ed. (EPIC 1999, 182 pages, softcover, ISBN: 1-893044-06-8, $20.00) http://www.epic.org/filters&freedom/.
*******************************
Intellectual Property Rights on the Internet
Debate is becoming more urgent, in the United States and elsewhere, about another, no less significant issue affecting the practice of online education. This item is also picked up from MediaMentor.
Issue: Intellectual PropertyBack to Contents
Congress has much on its table with respect to copyright and the Internet. The issue extends far beyond the scientific community, affecting millions of stockbrokers, librarians, real estate agents and publishers -- anyone who makes a living collecting information. Today, such compilations or databases go largely unprotected by copyright laws that safeguard the interests of the authors and publishers of creative works. The database owners fear they will lose profits if outsiders can freely copy their information as it costs them tremendous amounts of money to collect and enter such data. On the other hand, companies such as Yahoo! fear they could be run into the ground if they can't easily trade works. The debate is essentially between people who collect raw data and people who distribute it. Real estate agents, for example, gather information about which apartments are available. Their concern is that an online publisher could see their listings in the window of an agency, copy them, and put them up on a Web site -- all perfectly legal under current federal law.Lexis keeps vast collections of court decisions. They might be faced with a competing on-line publisher who decides to use Lexis data to launch a Website of all court decisions from Massachusetts -- also perfectly legal under copyright law. "Why would anyone spend $2 million to create a database if it's not going to be protected?'' said David Mirchin, of SilverPlatter Information, a database publisher in Norton, Massachusetts. Companies such as AT&T and universities such as Brandeis in Massachusetts want legislation that would not restrict people from copying databases unless they plan to use the information in a directly competitive way. Behind the push for stricter copyright regulations are Reed Elsevier, owner of Lexis-Nexis and of Cahners Publishing of Newton, Massachusetts, the American Medical Association and the National Association of Realtors. [SOURCE: San Jose Mercury, AUTHOR: Boston Globe http://www.mercurycenter.com/svtech/news/breaking/merc/docs/075686.htm]
The issues and other matters raised in this section of WEB are intended to derive from membersâ concerns and suggestions.
Input to WAOE-Views during the recent Annual General Meeting showed us that members are looking for opportunities to engage with important issues and ideas affecting the Web-based delivery of teaching and learning, but also that we need to do more to spell out to our members details of the organisational procedures through which they will get to know more frequently and reliably what goals the Association is pursuing, what action is being taken to realise these goals, and - most importantly - how members may make the most effective contributions to WAOE.
As a result, a new column, WAOE Policies and Procedures, has been split off from WEB Ideas and Issues. This will free the WEB Ideas and Issues column to be taken up more and more by topics of interest arising from the thinking of the members at large about their own professional practice in online education, and the role that WAOE as a whole and the sub-groups in which members are most actively engaged might play in lifting the standards and quality of Web-based teaching and learning.
If you have a concern to express, an idea to suggest, a question to raise, a point to make about online education in general and about WAOE's work in relation to online education in particular, write a short item for the WEB Ideas and Issues column and send it to the WEB Editor. On a smaller, less formal scale, you might prefer to air your views first of all in the Your Say section of WEB. Depending on the nature and volume of early responses to the Your Say item, matters raised may spark an article in the Web Ideas and Issues section of WEB, a free-ranging discussion on WAOE-Views, or a structured debate or online chat via the WAOE WebBoard.
Back to Contents
#############
On the Horizon: September-October Issue
Go to the September/October issue of On the Horizon, "a print and Web-based
periodical that focuses on signals of change on the
horizon that can affect educational organizations," at http://horizon.unc.edu/horizon/.
In this issue:
Back to Contents
################
Here is another site that a member might like to review and report on for the benefit of WAOE colleagues. Web Editor
"The Node is pleased to announce the upcoming launch of its new service, theNode.org, on 18 October 1999. This is an international community of instructors, trainers, designers and administrators with a professional interest in teaching with technology. Services will support users in developing and sustaining effective education and training practices and in exploring new ways to use technologies to support their learning objectives.
"Through theNode.org, we will continue to develop our freely-available resources to help you choose, use and evaluate learning technologies. We will add extensive new resources for members to assist them directly in teaching and training through technology."
For more information, the prospectus at <http://thenode.org/membership/prospectus.html>.
Information on how to join theNode.org is available at
http://thenode.org/membership/.
Back to Contents
################
Release of Personal Information
You might recall that the top of the registration form in the Membership pages of the WAOE Website contains the statement, "This information will be stored in the WAOE database, and will not be made publically available without your prior consent." This gives a clear indication of our commitment to respect members' privacy and to maintain strictly the confidentiality of personal details provided through the registration process. Unfortunately, however, it would be a nearly impossible task to apply the statement literally at the individual level of membership.
No addresses or other personal information about members will be released to persons or organisations outside WAOE. However, to make the various parts of WAOE functional, it is essential that Officers are able to communicate freely with members, and members are able to contact each other. This necessitates the distribution of personal information within the organisation, but normally only names and email addresses will be required. It would obviously be a wasteful and unmanageable burden for the members of WAOE's Coordinating Ring to have to seek permission on an individual basis for the release of some 900 members' names and email addresses. Therefore, we need to obtain permission in a more efficient way for lists containing your first and last names and your email address to be distributed to members of the Ring, in the first instance, and thereafter to the Committees or OCREWs in which you have expressed an interest; to project, discussion and other groups that are started from time to time; and to members of WAOE at large. All other information in the membership database will be kept confidential, accessible only by the Coordinating Ring, as WAOE's executive management body.
We are (still) in the process of finalising a new registration form which will automatically authorise the release of names and email addresses according to the policy described above. Until that form comes into use as part of our totally re-organised registration, database management and fee-payment procedures for the new 1999/2000 financial year and beyond, we need to take a simple collective approach to securing the authorised release of limited personal information within the Association.
This article constitutes a notice to all members of WAOE requesting the release of personal information within the Association, normally limited to members' names and email addresses. If, after reading the notice, you have an objection to these details being made known or distributed to other officers and members of WAOE than the Directors and the Coordinating Ring, please advise the Membership Officer immediately. If you do so object, the Membership Officer will need to discuss with you some other appropriate way or ways in which you will be able to participate fully in the main activities of WAOE. Any suggestion you can make when sending your message of objection would be very welcome.
Back to Contents
#############
Waiver of Membership Fees/Dues - Policy
WAOE has adopted the following policy on waiver of/exemption from payment of membership fees/dues for the 1999/2000 period. This statement is summarised from the official Minutes of the Planning and Finance Committee for April 1999. If you wish to read the original resolution as it was subsequently adopted by the Board of Directors, go tohttp://www2.ec.erau.edu:8080/read?558,24(If you cannot get to this page, go to theWAOE WebBoard and login by entering the first part of your email address (before @), and enter the password "waoe," without the quotes. If you stil have difficulty, contact the WebBoard Manager,Mike Warner.)
All members of WAOE are expected to pay the $US10 membership fee or dues from July 1 1999, unless they have applied for and received waiver. There are no provisions for waiver of fees or dues to be applied automatically by or on behalf of the WAOE Board of Directors; all waivers must be applied for by individual members.**********************Members may initiate requests to the Membership Officer for waiver of fees on one or more of the following grounds:
* As an alternative to seeking waiver of fees on the basis of excessive funds transfer or currency exchange costs, members may apply to have this expenditure applied to any future costs they might incur for participation in WAOE activities over the next two years (eg the online professional development course being developed by Nick Bowskill).They are providing service to the Association (eg convening a Committee or OCREW or managing a project); The costs of funds transfer or currency exchange would be excessive in relation to the fee amount of $US10 *; They are in a situation of severe financial hardship. Normally, applications will be considered by the Membership Officer in terms of the policy as summarised here, and in consultation, if necessary, with the Treasurer or with the full Board of Directors.
WAOE will accept at face value any member's statement of hardship or excessive transfer/conversion fees, and we will make a standardized reply emphasizing that the service-in-lieu will be the sole recourse for any future application for waiver of fees. All service-in-lieu requests will be confirmed by the applicable Committee Chair or OCREW Convener or WAOE Coordinating Ring member.
In the event that a member's initial application for waiver of fees or dues is not accepted, the member will have the right to seek a review of his/her application by the full Board of Directors. Such members will be advised of this right and the process to be followed as the occasion arises.
Waiver of Membership Fees/Dues - Procedure
To apply for waiver of fees/dues, send an email message to theMembership Officer.
For convenience, applicants may copy/cut and paste the following text into their email message:
I wish to apply for waiver of the WAOE membership fee/dues for the 1999/2000 period.Back to ContentsMy application is based on the following ground(s):
Please strike through whichever ground(s) are NOT applicable.I am providing service to the Association; The costs of funds transfer or currency exchange would be excessive; I am in a situation of severe financial hardship. In support of my application I wish to present the following information:
Please insert an appropriate statement, keeping it as brief as possible.
Notifying Change of Email Address
It can sometimes be a real headache keeping track of members who change their email addresses, or who occasionally use a different email address for corresponding with us than the one through which they registered and which therefore is listed on the official database. Such changes or differences of address account for at least some of the "permanent fatal errors" that get reported with each large-scale mailing that goes out to members. No doubt time wasted in contact the members concerned double-checking WAOE's membership records and various mailing lists is greater now - while such details are captured and maintained on an essentially manual basis - than they will be once our systems become fully automated. However, it seem very probable that effective communication within WAOE will always be reliant to a significant extent on the willingness of members themselves to keep us informed of their whereabouts.
As soon as we are able to attend to this matter among the various priorities for action to improve the database and query system, an electronic form for notifying changes of email address will be provided on the WAOE Website and in each issue of WEB. In the meantime, we request members who change their contact details to take the initiative and trouble to notify us as soon as possible.
Procedure: Send an untitled email message to the Membership Officer containing the text (without the quotes): "I wish to advise that I have changed by email address. My new email address is < insert details >."
Back to Contents
#############
How to Unsubscribe from Listserves or Resign from WAOE
For a quick check-list of the procedures for getting off WAOE's listserves or the mailing list for WEB, or for resigning from the Association altogether, go to the WAOE's Communications page of the WAOE Orientation Course. Scroll down to the heading "How to Unsubscribe from Listserves or Resign from WAOE," or use the link in the frame on the left hand side of the page.
Back to Contents
#############
About WAOE Policies and Procedures
In this still early formative period for WAOE, it is probably inevitable that items for information and discussion put out by WAOE's elected and appointed Officers will predominate in our information venues and discussion forums, because we are all concerned to help members understand and reflect on what the Association is about and to encourage them to be active in its work. In past issues of the bulletin, there has been a tendency - in the absence of another column better suited to that purpose - for managerial matters to take up a larger share of the space under the WEB Ideas and Issues heading than they should. This has tended to squeeze out other topics of broader interest to online educators which might have appeared there, and perhaps even discouraged members from contributing to discussion of those topics, or raising topics of their own.
As WAOE grows, we will dedicate space in the WAOE Policies and Procedures column to updating information about WAOE as an organisation, and encouraging the active involvement of members in our online meetings, Committees and OCREWs, discussion forums, projects, special events etc and to take all other opportunities that present themselves for making a contribution to WAOE.
Back to Contents
#############
No items for this issue.
Back to Contents
#############
Each issue, this section of WEB will include information about meetings of WAOE committees, OCREWs and other groups that are coming up within the ensuing fortnight. All members of WAOE - both associate and voting members - are welcome to attend these meetings and contribute to discussion. Of course, only the duly elected or otherwise designated members of WAOE's organisational committees may take part in any formal voting on matters for decision.
Back to Contents
#############
To help arrange synchronous meetings, WAOE uses World Time Zone in JavaScript.
Back to Contents
#############
No items in this issue.
Back to Contents
#############
The WAOE Electronic Bulletin (WEB) is the official newsletter of the World Association for Online Education. WEB will raise issues relevant to the conduct and development of the Association, convey important information to WAOE members, encourage active participation in the affairs of the Association, and provide a forum for members to make a contribution.
WEB will be posted every two weeks or so to a mirror Website - URL http://www.waoe.org/web/index.htm (although the address or the links to the site may cane from time to time). At the time of publication each member will be sent an email message stating the URL and listing the contents of the current issue. Those few members who are unable to access WEB via the Website, or who prefer to receive the bulletin via email, will be sent each issue both as an email message and as an attached file in html format.
If you missed an issue and would like to look back, WEB is now archived on the WAOE Website.
Members are still expected to subscribe to WAOE-News (see WAOE Links), because that listserve will continue to operate as the medium for official announcements, which you may expect to become more frequent as WAOE develops. WEB will adopt a more comprehensive, detailed and newsy approach to providing items of useful and interesting information to members than is appropriate via WAOE-News. In particular, it will act as a gateway to the various and growing number of sites and locations within WAOE where exciting things are happening.
Back to Contents
#############
The World Association for Online Education (WAOE) is a nonprofit public benefit corporation, incorporated in the State of California, USA. WAOE is organised for charitable purposes and not for the private gain of any person.
Back to Contents
##############
See the WAOE's Objectives and Associated Documents page of the WAOE Orientation Course.
Back to Contents
##############
The Meaning and Exercise of Membership in WAOE
WAOE is incorporated in the State of California as a non-profit and public benefit membersâ organisation. The membership owns it. We want all members to be active in the Association in all the ways and to the greatest extent that they wish to or can manage to be involved.
And because we are an incorporated professional organisation - as well as a globally spread association of professionals - there are various policies, rules and procedures that we are obliged to follow in order to maintain our official standing under Californian law. Observance of these requirements is an all the more sensitive matter for us because we are engaged in the delicate process of securing recognition as a tax-exempt organisation for the purposes of receiving grants, sponsorships and donations. Some of the most important expectations of and obligations on our members are summarised below.
No doubt, many members will not be especially interested in the details of the conduct of WAOE's affairs according to our legal obligations, and certainly our hope is that this bulletin and other WAOE elements and activies will always, ultimately, strike the balance of focus in favour of matters concerning the best professional practice of online education rather than somewhat dry questions of organisational policy and procedure. However, WAOE is an organisation, a legal entity - and necessarily so in order to be able to fulfil its objectives. In this still very early period in our establishment and growth, we are inevitably pre-occupied with such questions - which are not necessarily dry to every intellectual taste, of course, nor lacking in their own intrinsic interest. Please bear with us and look to where we are headed, and not just at the sometimes painstaking and tedious little steps we have to take along the road!
Becoming a Member
If you're reading this article, you've already joined, of course.
This means you have filled out and submitted the registration form found through
the Membership link on the home page of the WAOE
Website. And, from September 1999 onwards, it will also mean that
you have paid the annual subscription fee of $US10 (we are asking for renewing
members to pay the fee by September 1).
At this stage, there are only two categories of membership of WAOE: associate members and voting members. For more information, have a look at Article 12 of the Bylaws for more information. Also, our Incorporation FAQ page maintained by Treasurer, Jenna Seehafer, sets the rights and responsibilities of members within the context of Californian law. (Jenna is responsible, with help from Parliamentarian Mike Warner on the organisation and conduct of meetings in particular, for liaison with Californian authorities and for ensuring we observe all legal requirements in our policies and procedures.)
Associate Membership
Registration and payment of the fee automatically makes you an associate
member of WAOE. This basically means you can do or read or join anything
and everything that WAOE has to offer, except stand for office, nominate other
eligible members for office, or vote in our constitutional forums or occasional
ballots on issues of policy. As an associate member, you will receive
an email notice when the WAOE Electronic Bulletin (WEB) appears on its Web site
every two to three weeks, along with a list of the contents of the current issue.
You'll have access to JOE, our refereed Journal of Online Education, and you'll
be able to join any of the Committees or one or other or more of the Online
Course and Resource Evaluation Workgroups (OCREWs) that are currently active.
In fact, as we become more established in our ways of operating we'll push our constitutional expectation that every associate member should belong to at least one OCREW or similar group as a minimum commitment to active participation in the Association's affairs.
All associate members are expected to subscribe to the announcement listserve, WAOE-News, as a matter of course.
Voting Membership
Voting members are those associate members who have formally identified
themselves as people who wish to participate in the governance of the Association.
They would attend formal meetings of the Association, make nominations and cast
votes in general elections for WAOE, and participate in the ballots through
which key decisions affecting WAOE are taken. Voting members are the "members"
referred to in the WAOE Bylaws in compliance with the requirements of Californian
incorporation law, which recognises voting members only, as we define them.
Thus, only voting members may be included in the quorum for formal meetings
of WAOE such as the recent Annual General Meeting, and have their votes counted
on motions proposed or in ballots conducted during such meetings or other official
events.
An associate member may become a voting member by the simple act of sending an email message to the Membership Officer (officially titled the Chair of the Membership Committee) - stating that he/she wishes to be recognised as a voting member. Fo convenience, you could just copy/paste the following text into that message: "I wish to be recognised as a voting member of WAOE" (without the quotes). No additional fee payment is required.
Conversion of membership becomes effective within 10 days after the request is received. Under this rule, the eligibility of voting members to be included in the quorum count for any formal meeting or ballot is declared and announced 10 days prior to the notified starting time for that meeting or ballot.
Once conferred, voting-member status will continue for as long as each designated voting member wishes to retain that level of participation in WAOE.
Relinquishing Voting Membership
Voting members may revert to non-voting status (ie associate members)
simply by writing a letter or email to WAOE's President
or Executive Secretary explaining
their intention to become less active in WAOE and their wish to end
their membership or to convert it to an associate membership.
Annual Renewal of Membership
Both associate and voting members are required to renew their membership
between July 1 and July 30 of each year, commencing in 1999. The conditions
of and procedures for renewal are decided annually by the Directors on advice
from the Planning and Finance Committee at its April meeting, and advised to
members shortly afterwards. Failing to renew membership, including payment
of (or waiver from) any subscription fee, will be understood as resignation
from WAOE membership (WAOE Bylaws,
Article 12,
Section 9).
Back to Contents
#############
WAOE's Communications and Discussion System
The principal legal, structural and organisational way in which our objectives are realised is through The Meaning and Exercise of Membership in WAOE.
Less formally, perhaps, but no less crucially in their own ways, WAOE maintains a system of listserves and discussion groups as our means of establishing and maintaining communication between the management of the organisation and the membership and between members themselves and encouraging active participation in discussions, forums, projects and so on. This system is described in the WAOE's Communications page of the Orientation Course.
Back to Contents
#############
When you filled in the membership registration form, you identified which of the various Committees and Online Course and Resource Evaluation Workgroups (OCREWs) you are interested in. This article is concerned with providing members with more information about these major components of the structure and organisation of WAOE, but it will concentrate mainly on OCREWs. The article is based to some extent on an item about OCREWs originally included in WEB Volume 1, Number 2 (March 28 1999).
Committees
The purposes of the various Committees and how these might work
towards the fulfilment of WAOE's objectives
is perhaps fairly readily understood from their titles and composition,
as they appear on the membership registration form:
Membership CommitteeAt this stage, with the notable exception of the Planning and Finance Committee (which meets monthly) and the Online Educator Development Committee, none of these bodies is active, and not even the exceptions are in fact completely established and operational as yet, with a full complement of members networking to discuss issues and proposals relevant to each Committee's brief, and making recommendations to the Coordinating Ring and the Board of Directors. There are several probable reasons for this:
Finance Committee (now the Planning and Finance Committee)
Dissemination Committee
Records Committee
Web Design Committee
Online Educator Development Committee
Affiliate Liaison Committee
Research & Publication Committee
Online Academic Conferences Committee
Online Parliamentary Procedures Committee
******************************
Online Course and Resource Evaluation Workgroups (OCREWs)
According to the Archive
of Founding Documents, OCREWs could be described, at least in intention,
as the heart and soul of the Association. (Extending the metaphor, Committees
might be thought of as the bones and sinews.) OCREWs provide the main
locations and focal points for members to contribute in practical ways to the
enhancement of online education as a professional discipline. And that's
WAOE's core business.
In conception, OCREWs comprise groups of members interested in particular aspects of online education and training who meet and work together online - sharing ideas and information, discussing issues, making representations to relevant agencies and other forums, pooling resources, and so on. And in doing all this, such groups will make the strongest possible and most useful contribution to realising the central purpose of WAOE. This is because the contribution will be coming from professionals across the complex and rapidly developing field of online education and training who are directly testing and extending the possibilities of the field as they confront the problems posed by their online students and clients, experiment with workable solutions to them, and share what they learn with colleagues around the world.
Although OCREWs are given a defined place in WAOEâs structure and organisation, and a list of them appears on the memberâs registration form, there are no set ways by which their role can be carried out. The groups are being set up which are not listed on the registration form (though they may cover some of the territory) - the Education Standards OCREW, and the Educational Software and Courseware OCREW, the Industry and Academia OCREW - and an invitation by Mihkel Pilv for members to join a "learning by teaching OCREW initiative" stands on the home page of the WAOE Website.
You could use the lists of the Directors and the members of the Coordinating Ring to find out more about a particular structural group or an initiative which interests you - better still, to make contact with a view to joining an OCREW or other body - or perhaps to suss out how members who have started groups went about it and what agenda and processes they are establishing. Vice-President Mihkel Pilv carries particular responsiblity for encouraging and supporting OCREWs and other action groups. He will be glad to answer any queries you may have.
Members of the Coordinating Ring, WAOE's elected management executive, are looking at ways of revising the registration form to better reflect the flexibility that actually exists in the formation and operation of these vital groups. As a result, the current request to check an OCREW box will be replaced by a more open-ended invitation to identify interest in various aspects of online education and training, perhaps using a checklist with scope for members to add their own topics.
Although we plan to improve the information-gathering mechanism, notional commitments to particular OCREWs already suggested through the registration process already provide a useful basis for clustering members into potential participants for WAOE officers and others starting up new groups to contact in exploratory ways. In a still broader approach, personal contact with members could be used, as time permits, to tease out more specific information about what they are interested in, as well as what they hope to gain from joining WAOE, and how they would like the organisation to run.
To an extent, the same organisational priorities and difficulties that have slowed implementation of the committee system have inhibited the formation of OCREWs, particularly the delays in setting up electronic communications among members linked to a comprehensive and relational database. However, OCREWs by their nature and intent are not so constrained, in structural and organisational terms, as designated Committees. The W in the acronym stands for Workgroup, after all, and there is great flexibility in the number and kind of OCREWs that could be set up, as the presently active groups amply illustrate. In fact, working groups of members that get established need not necessarily be called OCREWs at all. They might be project teams, for example, or action research groups, or discussion forums with specialised agenda like Web access for people with disabilities.
The most important point to make about the specific action and discussion groups that come into operation - whatever they may be called - is that, like everything else in WAOE, they both belong to and depend on the membership. The field of online education and training is wide open for effecting vital changes and improvements, and WAOE needs the active participation and thoughtful contributions of its members in order to carry out its part in this vital work.
All that is required to get an OCREW or other group started is for a member to devise and promote a specific purpose for having a group and then to enlist at least three other members to join him or her in the enterprise. That's exactly how both the Education Standards and Industry and Academia OCREWs began. WAOE-Views or the Your Say section of WEB could be used to canvass interest and recruit like-minded colleagues. The next step is to announce the formation of the group to the Vice-President, Mihkel Pilv, who will give all the advice and assistance he can.
So, itâs over to you. The agenda is yours. Its your Association. Go to it!
Back to Contents
#############
This section lists URLs for key Websites within WAOE itself, and other URLs related to online education which have been identified by members.
WAOE Organisation and Communication Sites
**********************
WAOE Committees, OCREWs and Other Groups
Back to Contents
#############
Copyright © World Association for Online Education
Copyright in the contents of this Bulletin is held by the World Association
for Online Education (WAOE), incorporated in the State of California, United
States of America, as a non-profit, public-benefit organisation. For enquiries,
contact WAOE at waoe@waoe.org
#######################################################################
End of WEB Vol 1, No 13, October 31 1999.